Which statement about consent for photographing artwork is accurate?

• A. Verbal consent is sufficient
• B. Consent is not required
• C. Written consent of the client or legal guardian
• D. Consent from the art studio owner

Answer: (C)

Consent for photographing artwork hinges on having documented authorization from the person who created the work or their guardian. Written consent is preferred because it creates a clear, durable record of what is allowed, who may view or share the images, where the images may be used (examples include teaching materials, publications, or exhibitions), and how long the permission lasts. This protects both the client’s privacy and the therapist’s ethical responsibilities. Verbal consent, while a good initial step, isn’t enough on its own because it isn’t easily verifiable or enforceable. Consent from the art studio owner doesn’t address the individual’s rights and privacy, so it doesn’t substitute for the client’s or guardian’s authorization. In cases involving minors or individuals who can’t consent, a legal guardian’s written consent is required, often with assent from the creator when possible.